Exclusive: How the MSM Covered up Fast and Furious
April 16, 2012 by 6 Comments
By Ben Shapiro | April 16, 2012 | Breitbart
As Pavlich recounts, the first mainstream media outlet to report on Fast and Furious was CBS Evening News, which aired a report by Sharyl Attkinson. She stated that the scandal itself was so awful that “some insiders say it surpasses the shoot-out at Ruby Ridge and the deadly siege at Waco.” She pointed out that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives had been pushing through the sale of guns to Mexican drug cartels, and that gun shops had even tried “to stop the questionable sales, but ATF encouraged them to continue.”
When the Obama administration saw Attkinson’s report, they reacted with utter fury. Officials from the administration screamed at her; as Pavlich reports, Justice Department communications director Tracy Schmaler called her up to yell at her. White House spokesman Eric Schultz “reportedly directed a barrage of expletives toward her.” Attkinson said that the White House and Justice Department labeled her “not reasonable” – as opposed to other press outlets.
From their perspective, that was correct – Attkinson wasn’t reasonable because she wasn’t parroting the party line. The rest of the media, however, was only too happy to do so. As Pavlich writes, “The New York Times and Washington Post weren’t just ‘reasonable,’ they seemed to act as press officers for the Obama administration.”
Read the full article here.
Related Articles
- Obama, Calderón, Harper hold press conference (twitchy.com)
- AP’s Babington Can’t Understand Why Anyone Would Think Obama Doesn’t Support ‘Backburner Issue’ of 2nd Amendment Rights (newsbusters.org)
- Obama White House Still Refusing To Allow Former Staffer To Testify About Fast and Furious Scandal (blacklistednews.com)
- Romney asked to uphold the case -Holder of Fast and Furious be dismissed or resigns (hotdogfish.wordpress.com)
- FAST AND FURIOUS UPDATE: White House Blocking Access To Fast And Furious Witness Who Wants To Testi… (pjmedia.com)
- Barack Obama’s Bloodiest Scandal – Katie Pavlich – Townhall Conservative Columnists (gds44.wordpress.com)
- Why the Media Silence on Operation Fast and Furious? (johnmalcolm.me)
- Sources: Napolitano Lied to Congress (blacklistednews.com)
- New Book Contends Homeland Secretary Janet Napolitano Perjured Herself Before Congress (fromthetrenchesworldreport.com)
- Fast and, er, furious, Mr President? (oyiabrown.wordpress.com)
Digging Deeper Into Who Controls The World
April 16, 2012 by 3 Comments
By Susan Jennings | February 10, 2012 | Activist Post
As we delve deeper into world control, more information arises that helps us understand the current global situation. Many people are unaware of the interconnectedness between the largest global companies.Eighty percent of the world’s wealth appears to be earned by a “core” of 1,318 corporations, which in turn are being controlled by only 147 companies. Seventy-five percent of these companies are financial institutions — and the top companies on the list are the Federal Reserve banks.
The Federal Reserve created 26 to 29 trillion dollars’ worth of bailouts for their own companies between 2007 and 2010. This was revealed in their own audit statements, and confirmed by United States Congressmen and prominent financial analysts. (Source) Please note that the Federal Reserve, created in 1913, is a private corporation controlled by international bankers. (Source)
Anytime the ‘Fed’ prints money-Federal Reserve Notes, the American taxpayer is charged interest on the amount printed. Alan Greenspan admitted that “the Federal Reserve is an independent agency . . . there is no other agency of government who can overrule actions we take.”
As they understood the extreme dangers to our life and liberty, our founding fathers were adamantly opposed to a central privately controlled bank.
This global control occurs in multiple ways:
- Different companies having the same board members (this also includes members of the same family who may be on different boards).
- The ongoing movement between government leaders into private sector executive/board positions or lobbying positions for companies they formerly regulated and visa versa (Tim Geithner – former New York Federal Reserve Bank President becomes Obama administration’s Treasury Secretary).
- Stock or bonds held in other companies (Goldman considering keeping majority of Facebook shares in Initial Public Stock Offering).
- The division of competing brand names owned by the same company (Proctor and Gamble).
- Funding through private foundations for various associations (The American Medical Association since 1910 and National Education Association are heavily funded by the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations. Hmmm…helpful when you want to control public health and education).
- The ease with which those in power move between the fewer and fewer global companies and political offices.
The majority of radio, television and large Internet companies has become concentrated into the hands of just few companies. Fifty independent companies once comprised the media as of 1983. Now, Time Warner-CNN/TBS/TNT/AOL/Fortune/People; News Corp-Fox/New York Post/Wall Street Journal/MarketWatch.com; Walt Disney-ABC/ESPN/Miramax//Pixar; Bertelsmann-Most EU stations/Random House/National Geographic magazines; Viacom-CBS-Simon & Schuster/Comedy Central/BET/Paramount; and GE-NBC/Telemundo/MSNBC/ decide what is news. (Source) Such consolidation creates the ability to easily manipulate the masses via television, radio and printed media. This includes global news, political information, science, health and social values — which we have all seen go down the toilet. The desensitization to dead bodies &, increasing violence, glorification of anti-social behavior, i.e. the ones doing the most lying/cheating/stealing are the winners; the invasive surveillance systems to acclimate the public to a complete loss of privacy, and the lack of unbiased, actual reporting on critical events.
As a result, the NDAA, SOPA and PIPA legislation have all had a positive slant on them in Mainstream Media. The NDAA wipes out the 4th Amendment right to due process; and the latter two proposed laws remove our free access to websites, giving the government the right to take down Internet sites at will. Thus, their interests seem to be solely in maximizing their profits no matter the detrimental effects on the environmental, social and health of all life. All the while maintaining control of the global population through massive manipulation.
Read the full article here.
Related Articles
- David Wilcock: Major Event: Liens Filed against all 12 Federal Reserve Banks (the2012scenario.com)
- David Wilcock: Major Event: (nalonmit.wordpress.com)
- The Federal Reserve’s Medicine Men: Heroes Of A New Dawn, Or Vampires Of A Dying Night? (blacklistednews.com)
- Legislation to Audit the FED inches Closer (alakhtal.wordpress.com)
- Citi’s Pandit To Employees: Capital Goals Haven’t Changed (blogs.wsj.com)
Felonious Munk Presents: Stop It B! Post Racial Society? [Video]
Related Articles
Share this: